Ace the PSI New Jersey Real Estate Test 2026 – Unlock Your Property Power!

Question: 1 / 400

Which of the following statements would MOST likely be considered mere "puffing"?

Stating the property has great potential for investment

Claiming the property is the best in the neighborhood

Telling the buyer that he has certain rights under RESPA

The statement regarding telling the buyer that he has certain rights under RESPA is not an example of puffing because it refers to specific legal rights pertaining to real estate transactions. RESPA, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, outlines the rights of consumers in relation to the settlement process, making this statement factual and based on law rather than subjective opinion.

In contrast, the other statements involve subjective opinions and exaggerations about the property. For instance, claiming the property has great potential for investment, stating it is the best in the neighborhood, or suggesting it will sell quickly due to high demand are all expressions of opinion. These types of statements are intended to promote the property but lack concrete evidence, which is why they would typically be viewed as mere "puffing". Puffing allows real estate agents to market properties with appealing statements that may not necessarily be fully substantiated but are still common in advertising. Thus, the statement about RESPA rights stands out from the others due to its factual nature.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Suggesting the property will sell quickly due to high demand

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy